While in Italy two summers ago we spent nearly every day looking at art, a major portion of which was sculpture on a monumental scale. Not surprising, since sculpture is so integral to the cultural landscape of Italy – from the ancient ruins, monuments and elaborate fountains, to the architectural flourishes that adorn churches and public buildings.
But despite having lived for 10 years in a town teeming with monuments and public sculpture (Washington, DC), I’d never really spent that much time looking at sculpture. I mean REALLY looking at it: tracing the lines, admiring the hand of the artist and reflecting on the intentions behind the work. Even while visiting museums, I tended to gravitate toward the two-dimensional works. I mostly gave the marbles the cold shoulder.
Perhaps it was the environment – we are talking Italia after all – but it was impossible not to be moved by the sculptural works we encountered. From the drop dead gorgeous and otherworldly dynamism of Bernini’s sculptures in Rome’s Galleria Borghese, to the imposing equestrian sculpture of Marcus Aurelius and the Colossus of Constantine, both at the Capitoline Museum. These pieces stopped me in my tracks.
Back to earth and back home, I began to take notice of the monumental sculptures around me. Like most state capitals, Salem has a fair number of monuments and tributes in stone – most of which I’d only given a passing glance. But when I started to look closer, to really examine what’s here, I found there’s quite a bit to get excited about.
Take the two monumental relief sculptures flanking the steps to the Oregon Capitol Building. Sculpted by artist Leo Friedlander (American, 1888-1966), a New Yorker who studied at the Art Students League and later in Brussels, Paris and at the American Academy in Rome, they were conceived as part of the architectural design for the state’s third Capitol building, which was completed in 1938. The lead architect, Francis Keally, an associate with the New York firm Trowbridge and Livingston, was no doubt acquainted with Friedlander (they were contemporaries) and his work by reputation, and chose him to complement the pared down classicism of his Capitol design.
During his time in Rome circa 1915-16, Friedlander would have studied some of the same works we saw on our trip. Perhaps they even inspired his interest in large-scale public monuments. But in contrast to the Baroque, Classical and Renaissance works he would have encountered in Europe, Friedlander’s aesthetic grew to be spare and minimal, reflecting the Art Deco style that dominated during the heyday of his career. He may be best known for the gilded equestrian sculptures, Valor and Sacrifice, flanking the east entrance to the Arlington Memorial Bridge in Washington, DC.
(The genesis of these sculptures had many twists and turns; originally commissioned in 1929, they were completed in 1939 but then placed in storage because of budgetary battles and political maneuvering of the time. They were cast and eventually installed in 1951. An interesting side note: the bronze casting and gilding was completed in Italy, as a gift from the Italian people, using Marshall Plan funds. A nice full-circle story for Friedlander.) Friedlander is also well-known for two bas relief panels he created for Rockefeller Plaza. Radio and Television, sometimes collectively called “Transmission,” are spare, Art Deco sculptures installed in 1939.
The reliefs at the Oregon State Capitol Building are similarly minimal, but not as severe in execution. While the 30 Rock sculptures have an other-worldly, futuristic feel, these have an earthly warmth about them. On the east side of the entrance is Lewis and Clark led by Sacajawea, with the inscription Westward the star of empire takes its way, and on the west side of the entrance, a piece titled The Covered Wagon, showing a pioneer family navigating the Oregon trail above the inscription Valiant men have thrust out frontiers to the setting sun. Maps on the backside of each sculpture show the route of Lewis and Clark, and the Oregon Trail respectively. Both sculptures are rendered in the same Vermont marble as the Capitol building. One of my favorite parts of each sculpture is the attention paid to the botanical landscape – each panel features a plant found in Oregon’s high desert. It’s a deliberate detail that stands out in this monumental scale – a homage perhaps to the landscape, both hospitable and hostile, that explorers and pioneers encountered as they traversed our state. Standing back and taking in the whole, what strikes me is how harmoniously the sculptures blend with the Capitol facade. Sculpture and monuments are often an afterthought, or added piecemeal as history unfolds; but in the best instances, as found here, the art and the architecture speak to one another, their conversation delighting the eye.
Last week, I happened by the Capitol while facilities personnel were giving the sculptures a spring cleaning. As they showered the panels with a pressure washer, I couldn’t help wondering about questionable conservation practices…yikes…but with the recent layers of exhaust and grime removed, they now await your gaze.
What do you think? What makes a successful public monument?